Friday, October 31, 2008

Should Christian Believers support Obama?

Frank Pastore makes a compelling case that bible believing Christians should not vote for or support Barack Obama...
Here is the trailer.  The full 3 part video is also available



Trailer: The Christian Case Against Barack Obama

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Stupid Governors and Mayors

They "plead for help" from the Federal Government.

Does  ANYONE in government (or in the population for that matter) understand the LIMITS of Federal power?  They ARE ENUMERATED in the U.S. Constitution.

Of course Barack Hussein Obama, peace be upon him, has already shown what he thinks of the U.S. Constitution.

Monday, October 27, 2008

From his own lips - He doesn't believe in the U.S. Constitution

Shameful that so many would actually support this marxist/socialist collectivist elitist.

You MUST view this and share it with your friends.



OBAMA SAYS CONSTITUTION DEEP FLAW CONTINUES TODAY

They get mad when you point out what they are

And they lie about it too.

This is a MUST VIEW video and so will go to all of our sites



Obama Bombshell Redistribution of Wealth Audio Uncovered

Friday, October 24, 2008

If dissent equals patriotism

How many times have you heard a defensive demoncrat exclaim; "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism"?

I've heard it a lot and not just from politicrat donkeys but from their sheople as well.

I would even buy that argument if that is what the socialist/PC/Collectivist types truly meant.  It isn't.  You must do the silent mental translation of nearly all the leftist progressives spout.

You see, the Donkeycrats can't stand dissent, don't want dissent and want to use the power of government to suppress dissent.

To a Democrat, lying about reality is "dissent".  Dissenting from progressive views is "hate" and should be proscribed.

To a Democrat any dissent from their politically correct (in their own minds) world view isn't disagreement it is open advocacy of "hate" and proof of the dissenters "not caring", "being callous" and "being selfish" amongst other things.

Only to a collectivist is individual freedom "selfish".  Pray that the demoncrats don't use their government monopoly (inevitable according to them and their press lackeys) to suppress YOUR American Freedom.

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

This is where you'll find them

Many actual conservatives, most libertarian minded and all constitutional originalists would have to agree with this.  While not thinking the U.S. is so gone as to agree with the more extreme approaches.

Don't fail to vote due to disgust, frustration or hopelessness.  Send a message to the "major" parties.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Tolerance... only for those who agree

The leftist WaPo actually gets credit for publishing this ugly example.

See the reaction of "tolerant" "progressives" when others DARE to exhibit support for anyone or anything that isn't of the collectivist left.

It is pretty disgusting that so many "caring" people can't stand political debate.

Read this and tell us what you think

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Is this what we are in for? Many folks seem to want it

Chances are this is what we are in for....



Ready for a "Cultural Revolution"? How about we purge some kulaks while we are at it.

Never dull looking at Obama extremist collectivist race issues

Stanley Kurtz shows here some more interesting information that illustrates the radical marxist racial seperatist worldview of Barack Hussein Obama

Monday, October 13, 2008

Speaking out

Very good point made here by Doug Giles.

Having faith doesn't preclude or prohibit speaking out politically no matter what the IRS thinks.  ACORN is as big or bigger organization (and non-profit) than most if not all Church and ministry organizations.

Right to not be silent

To appreciate the Demoncrats beliefs on use of government power read Roger HedgecockStand up for American Freedom!!

Friday, October 10, 2008

Fairness

Fairness is important to many if not all people.

I'll buy that.  I want fairness and want to act fairly in dealing with others.  I'm not driven by some irrational envy of those who have achieved more than I have.

Tax fairness is a constant diatribe of the left.  Larry Elder (as have Lott, Williams, Sowell and many other sensible people) points out the inherent unfairness of U.S. Federal taxation.

Here are the telling facts:
The top 5 percent (those making more than $153,542 -- the group whose
taxes Obama seeks to raise) pay 60 percent of all federal income taxes.

The rich (aka the top 1 percent of income earners, those making more
than $388,806 a year), according to the IRS, pay 40 percent of all
federal income taxes.

The top 1 percent's taxes comprise 17 percent of
the federal government's revenue from all sources, including corporate
taxes, excise taxes, social insurance and retirement receipts.

If I charge you more than the person next to you for anything, please explain the "fairness" to me.

Tell me how this illustration strikes you:

Suppose
that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes
to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go
something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
So, that's what they decided to do.

The
ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the
arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. "Since you
are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of
your daily beer by $20." Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.

The
group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the
first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But
what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they
divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?'
They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted
that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would
each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested
that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same
amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay. And
so:

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.

"I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man," but he got $10!"

"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!"

"That's true!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!"

"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The
next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat
down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill,
they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money
between all of them for even half of the bill!

And
that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our
tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most
benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being
wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might
start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.


A "Lott" of lies by Biden

Perhaps it is not politically *nice* to point out falsehoods and call them "lies".  I find myself preferring to call untruths lies though because the only other answer would be grotesque ignorance.  Kind of scary to think a potential Vice-President is grotesquely ignorant.  John Lott points out Biden's bald faced lies.

Some examples:

-- Will McCain's health care proposals raise
taxes? Biden says that McCain’s proposal will cost people money. The
Tax Foundation finds that could easily be "roughly deficit-neutral over ten years."





--
Under an Obama Administration the middle class will "pay no more than
they did under Ronald Reagan"? No, the tax rates will be similar to the
higher rates under Clinton.





--
Did "we spend more money in three weeks on combat in Iraq than we spent
on the entirety of the last seven years that we have been in
Afghanistan building that country"? No, one year’s worth of spending in Iraq equaled five in Afghanistan.





-- France and the U.S. "kicked Hezbollah out of Lebanon"? No, and it wouldn't have made much more sense if he had said "Syria" instead.





--
Is it really “simply not true” that Obama said that he would meet with
the leader of countries such as Iran without preconditions? No, Obama said “I would.”





-- Did Obama warn against letting Hamas participate in Palestinian legislative elections in 2005? No.





-- Do “Iraqis have an $80 billion surplus”? No. If oil prices had remained high, it might have reached $50 billion by the end of this year.





--
Finally, an amusing point as evidence that Biden is just one of the
people he pointed to, inviting anyone to have a beer with him at
"Katie's Restaurant" in Wilmington, Del. Unfortunately, people will have a hard time taking him up on his offer, since the restaurant hasn't had that name for probably 15 years.


Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Where the real blame lies

Perhaps not ALL the fault and blame but it is amazing how Donkeycrat corruption is ignored by the "old" media.

Check this out and then ask Why Obama

Friday, October 3, 2008

Still More of them

As we noted previously, some people's idea of "the counsel of virtually everyone who knows anything about economics" may be a little skewed.

It seems the only people opposed to the economic "rescue plan" being considered by Congress are a large majority of Americans and  actual economists.

My aren't you proud of the politicrats "representing" (ruling) you?